Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.

It is a well-known fact that smoking is a hazardous behaviour that leads to unfavourable consequences. While some

countries

do not intend to prevent smoking in public

places

, others have already set laws against

this

. In

this

essay, I will discuss both views and show my support for the latter. On the one hand,

countries

that oppose preventing smoking in public

places

claim that if they do that it would harm small businesses as

this

would push people away from going to entertainment facilities. An example of

this

can be seen in Egypt, where restaurants and cafes that prevent smoking do not have many customers,

thus

they eventually close the place.

Furthermore

, opponents of

this

insist that the country's economy would be jeopardized. Since

this

approach would affect the tobacco companies that pay taxes to the state.

However

,

countries

that have set

this

law give convincing reasons.

To begin

, the supporters promote that the number of citizens who smoke would be minimized.

This

is because when smoking is not allowed they would have to stop smoking as long as they are in that place, or they would have to go to a great length to smoke one cigarette. The proponents are able to cite evidence from multiple

countries

,

such

as England, where smoking is not allowed in public

places

.

As a result

, the percentage of smokers is greatly lower

in contrast

to the

countries

that do the opposite.

Moreover

,

this

law would ensure that non-smokers in the community are protected. Those who support

this

law highlight the studies that emphasize the harm

second

-hand smoking could do,

thus

further

empowering

this

argument. In conclusion, there are

countries

that refuse to set laws against smoking in public

places

, as they claim it would harm the local business and their economy;

however

, other

countries

have passed these laws, and they claim that

this

would not only decrease the number of smokers in the country, but it would

also

protect the others from

second

-hand smoking.