Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.

It is a well-known fact that smoking is a hazardous behaviour that leads to unfavourable consequences. While some

countries

Use synonyms

do not intend to prevent smoking in public

places

Use synonyms

, others have already set laws against

this

Linking Words

. In

this

Linking Words

essay, I will discuss both views and show my support for the latter. On the one hand,

countries

Use synonyms

that oppose preventing smoking in public

places

Use synonyms

claim that if they do that it would harm small businesses as

this

Linking Words

would push people away from going to entertainment facilities. An example of

this

Linking Words

can be seen in Egypt, where restaurants and cafes that prevent smoking do not have many customers,

thus

Linking Words

they eventually close the place.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, opponents of

this

Linking Words

insist that the country's economy would be jeopardized. Since

this

Linking Words

approach would affect the tobacco companies that pay taxes to the state.

However

Linking Words

,

countries

Use synonyms

that have set

this

Linking Words

law give convincing reasons.

To begin

Linking Words

, the supporters promote that the number of citizens who smoke would be minimized.

This

Linking Words

is because when smoking is not allowed they would have to stop smoking as long as they are in that place, or they would have to go to a great length to smoke one cigarette. The proponents are able to cite evidence from multiple

countries

Use synonyms

,

such

Linking Words

as England, where smoking is not allowed in public

places

Use synonyms

.

As a result

Linking Words

, the percentage of smokers is greatly lower

in contrast

Linking Words

to the

countries

Use synonyms

that do the opposite.

Moreover

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

law would ensure that non-smokers in the community are protected. Those who support

this

Linking Words

law highlight the studies that emphasize the harm

second

Linking Words

-hand smoking could do,

thus

Linking Words

further

Linking Words

empowering

this

Linking Words

argument. In conclusion, there are

countries

Use synonyms

that refuse to set laws against smoking in public

places

Use synonyms

, as they claim it would harm the local business and their economy;

however

Linking Words

, other

countries

Use synonyms

have passed these laws, and they claim that

this

Linking Words

would not only decrease the number of smokers in the country, but it would

also

Linking Words

protect the others from

second

Linking Words

-hand smoking.