Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, because the price of houses in the
city
center
Change the spelling
centre
show examples
increases too fast to endure, more and more
people
choose to live out of the
city
and spend much
time
commuting. Some
people
suggest that we can replace
parks
and gardens in urban with more apartments for workers to decrease travelling
time
. On the other side, some
people
think
this
is not a good idea, and I will discuss both views below. Constructing apartments in the
city
center
Change the spelling
centre
show examples
not only can reduce the commute
time
but
also
the house price. When apartments supply rises, the price will fall, and more commuters can rent or buy them. The biggest advantage of living in the
city
is
time
, and
people
don’t need to spend much
time
travelling to work, and once the population of commuters decrease, the pollution of transportation will
also
decline.
However
, if we want to build more constructs, we need to remove
parks
and gardens in the
city
. To the
city
center’s
Change the spelling
centre’s
show examples
residents, these places are free leisure spaces that can walk dogs and exercise.
Moreover
, children
also
need
parks
to play with friends after school, which is an important way for children to learn how to make friends and interact with other
people
. If
parks
and gardens are reduced, residents need to spend more
time
and money to find a place to relax. In my opinion, living in the
city
center
Change the spelling
centre
show examples
and spending less
time
commuting is good for workers.
However
, the quality of life will decline if we construct too many buildings, and I think it is worth sacrificing some
time
on travelling to the company to change a comfortable life.
Submitted by tcc55662005 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • commuters
  • urban areas
  • housing availability
  • alleviating housing crises
  • public transport
  • traffic congestion
  • environmental health
  • biodiversity
  • recreational
  • mental health benefits
  • urban heat islands
  • green lungs
  • community interaction
  • cohesion
  • innovative urban planning
  • multi-use buildings
What to do next:
Look at other essays: