In the request for development, many countries allow their natural environment to be affected. Such a strategy is well worthwhile, an economic development should always be placed ahead of the environment. Argue both sides, and give your opinion.

Countries
nowadays are growing more priority to development than conservation of their
environment
.
This
trend is particularly seen in less developed
countries
where the forests are cut down in huge areas for building infrastructure. Some maintain that
such
a strategy of emphasizing economic advancement as opposed to the
environment
. My view,
however
, is that I would not agree with it. One primary reason is that it is hard to re-create a new ecological system in the short term.
For example
, trees cut down in the Amazon forest would take a few decades to grow so it is a difficult challenge for the local government to rebuild them.
Moreover
, it is
also
interesting to note that in Taiwan where the building was destroyed by landslides and floods due to overdevelopment. All these phenomena have shown that economic advancement becoming more important than the
environment
, and there will be an enormous economic loss in the long term that people have to pay for the
envirionmenatl
Correct your spelling
environmental
deterioration. Admittedly, economists especially in less developed
countries
may argue that without doing appropriate damage to their
environment
, their economic
growth
will be taken a hit. It's undoubted that the desire for people to have better development place and improve the quality of life.
Nevertheless
, it can be seen in the whole world that the more damage human does to the
environment
, the more we have to bear the counter back of nature. Clearly, the examples we proved it has shown that challenging nature, paying more money. To conclude, some
countries
are placing economic
growth
ahead of the
environment
although
the economy would make damage nature. Some governments take on some policies to conserve the ecosystem, putting the economic
growth
in front of the climate for benefit will result in undesired consequences.
Therefore
, it is imperative for humans to reach a balance between economic
growth
and the
environment
, making our world to be a ''sustainable development''.
Submitted by cello10214 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: