Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued that governments should invest money in

railways

instead

of roads. I completely agree with

this

point of view because

railways

are environmentally friendly and

also

an important economic driver.

Railways

help to protect the environment. Improving roads amounts to encouraging the public to use cars. The more cars on the road, the more carbon emissions.

However

, if governments spend money constructing

railways

, be they subways or tram lines, more people would opt for public transportation

instead

of private cars when travelling. Take Wuhan, China

for example

. Over the past 5 years, the government has built 10 subway lines that connect the entire city, making it easy for people to get around.

As a result

, city road traffic has gone down significantly.

This

is good for the environment since public transportation has much lower per capita carbon emissions than private vehicles.

In addition

, railway networks help to drive economies forward. Different cities have different strengths. With these networks, a country can become more connected, and

thus

businesses in different cities can collaborate more easily.

For example

, in China, all major cities are linked by high-speed rail.

This

allows various hubs,

such

as the tech hub Shenzhen, manufacturing hub Wuhan, and e-commerce hub Guangzhou, to work together to bring the best products out to the market fast. In conclusion, government spending should be on

railways

rather than roads. For one thing, improving

railways

encourages the use of public transportation and

therefore

benefits the environment. For another,

railways

play a key role in economic growth.