Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent travelling to work is to replace

parks

and

gardens

close to the

city

centre with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. In my opinion, I firmly disagree with

this

notion. The green public spaces have a

lot

of benefits to the

city

that I will explain in the following paragraph. On the one hand, the

city

is confronted with an overpopulation problem. It makes time spent travelling to work from traffic congestion. There are a

lot

of various types to solve problems.

Firstly

, The government's cooperative strategy with private companies to gain work from home time more than today.

Secondly

, The government should improve the standard of public transport due to inviting citizens to reduce the number of private cars in the street.

On the other hand

, I firmly disagree to replace green areas in the metropolitan to apartment buildings.

Parks

and

gardens

have a

lot

of benefits.

Firstly

,

This

place can relax lifestyles from the stress of in living the

city

. At the weekend,

Parks

and

Gardens

in my

city

can make music performances and a floor dancing. It's a good vibe place.

Secondly

,

This

place should support elderly people to exercise.

For example

, The Chatuchak park is open daily at 5.00 a.m. and elderly people are doing exercise.

Thirdly

, Green areas reduce the carbon footprint in the

city

because they have a

lot

of trees to absorb the CO2. In conclusion, I surely believe that

parks

and

gardens

are necessary for cities and I unsupport to replacing them with an apartment

building

Fix the agreement mistake

buildings

show examples

.