It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university education to a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the modern era of times, it seems impossible for a

country

to provide bachelor's degrees to a high percentage of youngsters as it does not yield visible benefits. I completely agree with the statement because of two reasons.

First

of all, a university education is very costly. That means, it requires a lot of expenses,

such

as tuition fees,

study

materials, and so on that are impossible for a

country

to pay on behalf of a student.

In addition

to these, the authority can not give advanced education opportunities to all the young people because of the lack of educational institutions. Take, Bangladesh,

for example

, where 34 public universities can hardly cope with 34,000 students out of 1,00000 higher

study

aspirants.

That is

to say, to provide a bachelor's degree to

such

numbers seems impossible as the education budget of Bangladesh is not so high and it can not increase overnight.

Secondly

, some governments are reluctant to graduate

study

as it does not yield productive outcomes. Most importantly, they are not interested in it because academic jobs are not abundant.

For instance

, if a student completed post-graduation from Bangladesh major in genetic engineering, they will not find any genetic farms to work with so they have to move abroad to enrich their career.

Therefore

, some authorities think higher studies are not beneficial. To sum up, providing a scope of advanced

study

seems daunting for a

country

as it is costly and lacks adequate educational institutions.

Moreover

, it does not bring any productive outcome to a

country

. So, I completely agree with the question prompt.