Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In many regions in the world, some people believe

this

is undoubtedly advantageous for the

Government

to fund money on supporting many creative

artists

, while others concur that many organizations, companies, and cooperation will sponsor ingenious painters.

This

essay will elaborate on both sides and state the reasons why I hold that the demerits are more significant. Many people claim that gifted

artists

would have the

opportunities

Fix the agreement mistake

opportunity

show examples

to reap the benefits from the

Government

. For numerous

artists

that are struggling with the matter, they sell their artwork to maintain their life, and sometimes their art performances might not bring them income. If they work with a mindset to work because of money not for artistic value that their paintings are never creative.

For example

, if the painters do not find the buyers that will lead to the matter they do not have enough money for paying materials. But if the authorities care about

itcare

Correct your spelling

it are

it, they can go on focusing on their creative works.

Thus

, the more

artists

cannot find income from their gifted art, the more the

government

's investment will not be useful, and it will be a waste. On the

second

hand, others hold that the sponsorship from many corporations is

also

a good way because it is more abundant and diverse than the

Government

.

In particular

, for the profit organization, companies, and cooperation that

isare

Correct your spelling

are

is

their motivation for supporting the

artists

are advertising. Take a good example of

this

is, that they will fund the ingenious

artists

, and when the

artists

become famous they

also

are well-known by the public.

Beside

Replace the word

Besides

show examples

that, they will put pressure on the

artists

if their net worth on creative paintings is too low or if their creative artwork is not glorified by the community. To conclude, it is a common belief that authorities should give expenditure sponsorship to ingenious painters and musicians. But it is evident that others believe that creative

artists

should be funded by alternative sources. In my opinion, I concur with the latter notion.