People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that learning

literature

is not beneficial for high

school

students. In my opinion,

this

is a valid viewpoint because

such

a

student

has more important tasks on their priority list,

such

as successfully entering a university, whereas novels and poems can become a serious distraction. High

school

is a crucial period for most people, as it signifies the transition from teenage years into adulthood.

Therefore

, every

student

must try hard to make the best

usage

Replace the word

use

show examples

of their time, whether

this

is preparing for higher education or acquiring new skills for future employment. Studying

literature

,

on the other hand

, is often an extremely time-consuming activity, which may distract students from their main targets. Many classic books,

such

as “War and Peace” by Lev Tolstoy, are too voluminous and can take months to finish, despite their great contents. The more sensible way to spend

this

time is by learning STEM subjects,

thus

enabling the

student

to accomplish their most immediate goals. Of course, it is true that reading novels and poems can greatly enrich our lives. Not only does

literature

help to develop our emotional intelligence, but it

also

offers a number of other tangential benefits like expanding our vocabulary.

However

, none of these advantages

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

time-bound, meaning students can study

this

subject later, not necessarily while at high

school

when time is limited. In conclusion, while I acknowledge the merits of learning

literature

, my firm belief is that a high

school

student

Fix the agreement mistake

students

show examples

should busy themselves with more urgent matters, namely applying for university and/or securing a stable job. (260 words)