Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People have been arguing about whether or not to use nuclear

weapons

. While there is some support for the advantages of nuclear

weapons

all over the world, from my point of view, I totally disagree with it.

First

, using nuclear

weapons

isn't the best way to solve the problem. While nuclear

weapons

are directly dangerous to humans and the environment, the effects of nuclear

weapons

are

also

expensive.

For example

, when the

first

nuclear weapon was dropped, it was a fission

bomb

nicknamed "Little Boy" on Hiroshima. Three days later, the US Air Force dropped a fission

bomb

, nicknamed "Fat Man," on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. The number of people killed has reached about 200,000. Building a city takes a very long time.

However

, for only a few seconds, the atomic

bomb

can take it all. Two cities were sunk in smog and many buildings were destroyed. People living in two cities were studying and working

were

Correct word choice

and were

show examples

interrupted and faced the pain of losing loved ones, stripping them of joy as well as hope and leaving behind psychological scars that time couldn’t erase.

Second

, nuclear

weapons

devastate the environment.

For example

, the United States tested a massive hydrogen

bomb

on the Bikini Atoll in 1954. It’s more than 65 years later, but

this

location in the Marshall Islands chain is still not livable. In conclusion, nuclear

weapons

are a critical problem that may cause threats all over the world.

Therefore

, the key to dealing with it should be addressed immediately.