It is undeniable that the
in question,
and
respectively, could not be
apart from one another on the academic spectrum.
, it is precisely due to these differences that both
and
offer equally fulfilling
and qualities to
that decide to pursue them. I believe that
should ideally pursue both
, or at least another combination of adjacent subjects
,Remove the comma
show examples
since what can be learnt through the
of
cannot be conveyed within the field of
alone, and
.
, I believe the perspective regarding
as a preferable
over
is somewhat warranted, due to the formative quality of the field and its ability to light a spark of independent thought into the minds of
.
teaches us not only
ofChange preposition
show examples
what has occurred, but it opens an opportunity to look at humanity on a timeline and analyze what mistakes we have made as a species and, most importantly, how to learn from those mistakes.
studying
are essentially handed over the reins and forced to forge their personal opinions, particularly on what socio-political views they gravitate towards most, gifting them with independent thought.
, studying
does not allow
to absorb different, conflicting perspectives, and it does not allow for debate in its most specialized form.
, when contesting these
subjectFix the agreement mistake
show examples
on the basis of which will be most formative in a social context, I strongly believe studying
will yield better results.
, studying
-focused subjects can be equally as rewarding as studying
and,
underChange preposition
show examples
a certain point of view, I believe it is a superior
for
to learn.
,
of judging these
based on their capacity to open
' minds to their political views, now let us assess them on their ability to gift
with essential
that will allow them to put their ideas into practice. With
assessment criterion, I would argue that
is far more essential for
to
than
is, as it focuses on finding real-world solutions to abstract ideas. More concisely, while
allows
to stretch their abstract thought,
grants them the tools to be able to turn those thoughts into reality.
,
offers
of greater practical relevance that
as a field cannot offer, pushing
to become ready to be integrated into the workforce and cementing their problem-solving capabilities.
, due to the overwhelming differences between
and
as
of
, I would argue that deciding which
is more important for
to
depends entirely on which criteria one is using to compare them.
, I believe it to be imperative that
have at least some exposure to both of these
,
they will run the risk of overdeveloping some of their
while remaining relatively oblivious as to the benefits they could obtain if they simply chose to broaden their academic area of focus.