Some people argue that student should read histry in school,other opine that they should read technology. discuss both views and give your opinio.

It is undeniable that the

fields

in question,

history

and

technology

respectively, could not be

further

apart from one another on the academic spectrum.

However

, it is precisely due to these differences that both

history

and

technology

offer equally fulfilling

skills

and qualities to

students

that decide to pursue them. I believe that

students

should ideally pursue both

fields

, or at least another combination of adjacent subjects

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

since what can be learnt through the

study

of

history

cannot be conveyed within the field of

technology

alone, and

viceversa

Correct your spelling

vice versa

vice-versa

.

Firstly

, I believe the perspective regarding

history

as a preferable

subject

over

technology

is somewhat warranted, due to the formative quality of the field and its ability to light a spark of independent thought into the minds of

students

.

History

teaches us not only

of

Change preposition

about

show examples

what has occurred, but it opens an opportunity to look at humanity on a timeline and analyze what mistakes we have made as a species and, most importantly, how to learn from those mistakes.

Students

studying

this

subject

are essentially handed over the reins and forced to forge their personal opinions, particularly on what socio-political views they gravitate towards most, gifting them with independent thought.

In contrast

, studying

technology

does not allow

students

to absorb different, conflicting perspectives, and it does not allow for debate in its most specialized form.

Thus

, when contesting these

subject

Fix the agreement mistake

subjects

show examples

on the basis of which will be most formative in a social context, I strongly believe studying

history

will yield better results.

On the other hand

, studying

technology

-focused subjects can be equally as rewarding as studying

history

and,

under

Change preposition

from

show examples

a certain point of view, I believe it is a superior

subject

for

students

to learn.

For instance

,

instead

of judging these

fields

based on their capacity to open

students

' minds to their political views, now let us assess them on their ability to gift

students

with essential

skills

that will allow them to put their ideas into practice. With

this

assessment criterion, I would argue that

technology

is far more essential for

students

to

study

than

history

is, as it focuses on finding real-world solutions to abstract ideas. More concisely, while

history

allows

students

to stretch their abstract thought,

technology

grants them the tools to be able to turn those thoughts into reality.

Consequently

,

technology

offers

skills

of greater practical relevance that

history

as a field cannot offer, pushing

students

to become ready to be integrated into the workforce and cementing their problem-solving capabilities.

Lastly

, due to the overwhelming differences between

history

and

technology

as

fields

of

study

, I would argue that deciding which

Correct your spelling

subject

stubject

Correct your spelling

subject

is more important for

students

to

study

depends entirely on which criteria one is using to compare them.

Consequently

, I believe it to be imperative that

students

have at least some exposure to both of these

fields

,

otherwise

they will run the risk of overdeveloping some of their

skills

while remaining relatively oblivious as to the benefits they could obtain if they simply chose to broaden their academic area of focus.