Governments in many countries are replacing old buildings such as art galleries and town halls with new ones. Is this a positive or a negative development?

In the contemporary epoch, numerous authorities tend to replace historical structures

such

as art galleries and town halls with modern ones. Personally, I strongly believe

this

approach is a negative development as,

firstly

, these

buildings

are a

part

of human history and should be preserved as a heritage for the younger generation and,

secondly

, it may have a negative impact on the state´s exchequer. It cannot be denied that historical

buildings

are

part

of the cultural legacy as they depict human history through their architecture. Replacing them with the new ones would be, undoubtedly, an imprudent approach as they take

part

in the education process as well. Linked to

this

,

for instance

, a vast number of school trips are usually made with the purpose to show children historical

buildings

, which might help them to imagine how their ancestors lived. To elaborate

the

Change preposition

on the

show examples

importance of old structures

further

, the architecture students spend hours studying historical

buildings

in person, as it offers a noteworthy opportunity to understand the details of each architectural style in a better way.

Moreover

, it is irrefutable proof that historical attractions are an inevitable

part

of financial resources for the state´s exchequer, as they tempt numerous tourists each year.

Additionally

, tourists enhance the economy of a particular country in numerous other ways,

such

as usually paying for

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

accommodation, food and transport.

Therefore

, it should be one of the politicians’ paramount aims to preserve and revamp the historical

buildings

. To conclude, from the aforementioned examples, removing old structures has more drawbacks, as they are a heritage for future generations and are a reliable source of the country´s income.