Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, the

health

of employees has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Some people claim that focusing on

health

activities

will be likely to enhance work performance. Others reckon that these

activities

do not bring any merits. Both views will be meticulously debated before giving my favour to the latter view. It is understandable that some extol the idea that doing exercises can gain dazzling advantages to increase work performance. It is because

health

plays an indispensable role in our life and work performance.

This

might be explained by the solid fact that the more wellness the workers have, the fewer reasons they have for taking sick leaves.

However

,

this

argument is implausible because leisure-based

activities

are quite difficult to quantify.

For instance

, fit shapes or better

health

of the staffs can be improved if they do exercises on the daily basis, it can not be seen in the short-term, which is not appropriate for people who have a strict schedule of works. To put more weight on my point of view that organizations should not spend budget on

health

pursuits, I believe that allocating money to tangible rewards is better.

Firstly

, employers are advised to focus on incentives

such

as vacations, pay increments, and on-the-job training, which will help the employees achieve better career progression.

Moreover

, investing money in training programmes

instead

of

health

activities

can enhance a plethora of employees’ skills

such

as critical thinking, specialized knowledge, and so on. In conclusion, both views have their own logical reasons. While paying for

health

activities

holds some credibility, it still has some flaws in its reasoning. I support using the money for other

activities

.