It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some

people

think that it is rarely both viable and advantageous for a country to study tertiary education for a wide range of young

people

. In my point of view, I completely agree with

this

idea. Not all

people

are qualified to go to

university

, especially who is in developing nations. In these countries, most

people

’s living standards aren't enhanced. Financial difficulties are the main reason lead young

people

can’t pursue a

university

education.

Moreover

, educational facilities and infrastructure are essential to building in order to serve their learning. But there are a lot of countries that aren’t likely to meet the basic necessities of life, like food and healthcare, so how they can provide a medium for learning.

That is

the difficulty of the state as well as the citizens. When all youngsters pursue tertiary education

also

brings some disadvantages. Everyone going to

university

want to get a distinction degree.

Then

take it to apply for a job in the company and just do clerical work. As a consequence of

this

thinking, it is deficient in manual workers,

such

as drivers or construction workers will lack employees.

Besides

, society is more and more developing, and more machines have replaced humans in working.

This

makes the unemployment rate on the rise and imbalances the

labor

Change the spelling

labour

show examples

market. In conclusion, it is impossible and unuseful to study higher after high school for a majority of youngsters. I think

university

is not the only way to succeed. There are many other ways to bring value and benefits to our life.

Therefore

, there is no need to follow the trend of college, but choose the path that suits you best.