Developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

In the modern era as an economy is developing it is necessary to require a large amount of cash. It is often argued that nations that already have the strongest health should have different sorts of offers

instead

Linking Words

of monetary funds. I certainly disagree with

this

Linking Words

notion because payment is the essential key brought development to y region.

Further

Linking Words

information about

this

Linking Words

will be discussed in the essay.

To begin

Linking Words

with, a well-set nation should give funds to backward ones. There are several reasons for

this

Linking Words

.

First

Linking Words

and foremost, if the economy gets the aid in the form of capital it can spend in a sector we were totally required.

This

Linking Words

leads to a boom

in particular

Linking Words

aspects of countries.

For example

Linking Words

, In 2003 USA built a major School in Bhutan.

However

Linking Words

, Bhutan actually has a lot of requirements in medical as their health sector is very downward. So countries like Bhutan need financial help

instead

Linking Words

of other aid.

Similarly

Linking Words

, a country that gets money from another nation can

first

Linking Words

pay its debt and release the burden of interest. As a consequence, their economy grows in an efficient manner.

For instance

Linking Words

, in 2016 India got a fever from Japan amount of 1000 crore. India used to pay its debt,

as a result

Linking Words

, the country grows rapidly and reported an 8 % increase in GDP in the

next

Linking Words

year. To conclude, after musing both sides of the argument I believe that financial aid is the best way to encourage other nations. Another kind of help is not efficient and there are several reasons to demonstrate that

this

Linking Words

is not the case