Some believe that advances in technology are increasing the gap between rich and poor while others think the opposite is happening. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Penetration of cutting-edge gadgets into our daily life, some people are concerned about not only the social gap but

also

the massive raising.

However

, the modernism advocators, including me, have their own justifications to follow new trends in appliances. In

this

essay, both views will be elaborated on. It is universally accepted that moving forward with technology has two significant drawbacks.

Initially

, modern devices would cost an arm and a leg in many cases.

Thus

, the majority of folks can not afford these kinds of expenditures and they prefer to use classic tools since neither they are inexpensive nor complicated. As a vivid instance, the previous editions of cell phones are more cost-effective and simple than the new ones.

Moreover

, not only does the penniless public have to work harder but

also

they should spend their money more economically in order to fulfil their dreams about novel inventions. Unfortunately, it is noticeable that

this

would make life unpleasant for

this

category. On the other side of the coin, dealing with technology has its own privileges.

Firstly

, I should mention that these cutting-edge devices have prospered to join individuals of different classifications from all over the world via social networking media like Whatsapp,Telegram and so on. The other thing is that we observe numerous modern facilities that can be bought by a wide number of citizens. I mean there are several new gadgets in the current market that may suit both the wealthy and the poor, so, it would satisfy everyone's palate. To recap the main points from what was mentioned above, it can be concluded that regardless of being really expensive and complex, there is a multitude of modern inventions that would fit anyone's taste in terms of deposit and customers' rights.