Every year several languages die out. Some people think this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is said that many
languages
die out on a yearly basis. While
a group of individuals maintains that it cannot be problematic because they believe that the fewer languages
, the easier life that people
experience, I strongly disagree with this
argument due to
the reasons that will be discussed.
Some people
justifiably argue that if governments do not consider efficient preventive measures so as to stop the extinction of endangered languages
, we will face several challenges. For example
, decreasing language
diversity can lead to the extinction of some cultures and customs that have been passed down from our ancestors. Since such
values shape people
's identities, the absence of these languages
can weaken their sense of identity. Moreover
, several endangered languages
are interesting subjects that are taught at universities in order to reveal historical mysteries. Therefore
, without them, researchers will run into serious problems, making it difficult to effectively explore historic ages.
In contrast
, another group claims that the more languages
that are present, the more difficulties tourists and travellers face. They insist that fewer languages
offer several benefits. For example
, my cousin, who is in favour of this
view, thinks that developing a universal language
should be taken into consideration because it helps people
interact with peers from all around the world. Moreover
, he thinks that it can help both the tourism industry and students who are willing to study abroad because language
barriers will be reduced and all people
can easily communicate with each other. However
, I do not find this
argument convincing, as each language
represents the culture and history of certain people
. Therefore
, if a language
dies out, the values that are associated with it, cultural values, for instance
, will be extinct. Thus
, all languages
are of historical importance and should be preserved.
In conclusion, I completely disagree with the extinction of languages
, as they are significant in terms of history and culture. Furthermore
, they can assist in uncovering historic problems.Submitted by m.r.zamani1376678 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The essay needs to more directly address the specific question of whether life will be easier with fewer languages. While related issues are discussed, it is important to tie all arguments back to this central question.
task achievement
The introduction could benefit from a clearer thesis statement that outlines the main argument of the essay. The current introduction is a bit vague in expressing the writer's stance.
task achievement
Concluding statements should reflect a comprehensive summary of the arguments presented, reinforcing the writer's position effectively. Including a more striking restatement of the main points in the conclusion would enhance its impact on the reader.
coherence cohesion
Utilize a wider range of cohesive devices to create a smoother flow between sentences and paragraphs. This will enhance the essay's readability and coherence.
coherence cohesion
Work on developing clear topic sentences that directly support the main argument. Each paragraph should begin with a sentence that clearly relates to the central topic, which is the potential ease of life with fewer languages.
task achievement
Provide more concrete examples to support your claims. While the essay presents interesting ideas, enhancing them with relevant examples could strengthen the effectiveness of the arguments.