Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries,as poor countries need that workers more.To what extent do you agree or disagree

Rapid urbanization and industrialization create a swift migration of people whereas;a wealthy

nation

should not hire

workers

from an underprivileged area.I see an eye-to-eye

nation

with

this

statement. My inclination is elaborated

further

. The foremost reason to support my viewpoint is; the exploitation of the labour force.

This

is to state that

workers

are been exploited by the officers in their working area. To illustrate, migrated

workers

are forced to work for extra hours without getting extra wages.Even though they are being discriminated against on the basis of colour, creed and caste.

Therefore

, a migrated employee has to tackle innumerable hurdles for their survival.

Moreover

, the work productivity of an underprivileged

nation

would be declining. The reason is skilled

workers

are being hired by the developed countries

consequently

the man force required for task completion would be lesser in number.

Additionally

, the scarcity of skilled

workers

would be a major drawback to society. A huge transfer of personages would create an economic imbalance.

Thus

, the country might face situations

such

as

a financial crises

Correct the article-noun agreement

a financial crisis

financial crises

show examples

.

Furthermore

, expansion of an individual's horizon.

That is

learning new traditions and customs helps people to broaden their perspective.

However

, building up new relations. To add to

this

, relation with another country might be useful. To illustrate, easy exchange of good products would help personage to expand their business scale. In conclusion, developed countries using hiring personages from an underdeveloped

nation

can create a developed

nation

can create a devastating impact on the country's economy, as well as employees, who might be discriminated against colour, caste and status.