The best way to solve the world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

These days, pollution is increasing dramatically by many factors, and it is believed that raising the

cost

of transport will be the best way to solve

this

global issue.

Although

people

may agree with

this

way, I fundamentally disagree with some aspects of

this

action. There might be several arguments in

favor

Change the spelling

favour

show examples

of increasing the

cost

of

fuel

for cars and other vehicles.

First

of all, there will be some

people

who cannot afford the new price of

fuel

.

For example

, they have to pay more for petrol

then

their expenditure has to increase, and their income may not come to that expectation.

Secondly

, if the government increases the

cost

of

fuel

, there might be no change because

people

still keep using the transport for their work and study.

Consequently

, the problem has not been solved but

people

will have some difficulties in

Correct your spelling

life

Correct pronoun usage

their lifes

show examples

lifes

Correct your spelling

lives

show examples

.

On the other hand

, the growth of

cost

in

fuel

Add an article

the fuel

show examples

may have considerable benefits in reducing many types of pollution.

Initially

,

instead

of driving cars, or other vehicles,

people

will try riding bikes to improve the condition of the environment.

Secondly

,

people

will have a chance to reinvent their consumption,

for instance

, depending on their income, they will calculate the average money they should spend on

fuel

and other essential activities. To sum up, to deal with the world’s environmental problem, increasing the

cost

of

fuel

for vehicles is not the best solution, and I am strongly in

favor

Change the spelling

favour

show examples

of remaining the unchanged

cost

in

this

field.