Some people think should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artist should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

The creative arts industry is one of the beneficial sectors that contribute to the growth of the

economy

. Most people are of the view that their work should be funded by the

government

whereas others think there is no need as there are alternative sources of financial support. I think the necessary support should be given,

this

essay is going to discuss both views, as well as my opinion.

To begin

with, offering the necessary assistance will boost the

economy

and promote tourism.

This

is because

this

will give them the urge and zeal to work harder.

Also

, because there is necessary funding, the quality of their craft will be increased resulting in patronage from foreign investors. The tourism industry would see growth as well.

For example

, musicians who have their music around the globe are usually being watched by foreigners and

this

helps to market our country well, pushing more investors to the country thereby boosting the

economy

as well.

However

, some people may say an alternative source of sponsorship would rather help as artists usually do their work for business purposes.

This

is because returns of their works are usually paid directly to them and not to the

government

but I think if they are funded, an agreement could be met and a deal struck.

This

would help in both ways as the

government

would have a fair share as well as the artist. In conclusion, I believe other sources of sponsorship may be of help to the industry but having the

government

's support would be beneficial.

This

would promote tourism and boosts the

economy

as well.