Some people think that the best way to reduce the fourth dimension spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with buildings apartments for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own public opinion

Opinions diverge as to whether it is more effective to erect buildings and apartments rather than green places
such
as parks, gardens, and so on to accommodate the worker's needs of travelling to work.
However
, I am of the firm notion that while the dismantling of friendly entertainment spots can bring both merits and drawbacks, the latter is still an obvious choice.
This
essay will attempt to address the reasons for my views as follows. On the one hand, there is an array of testaments why it is believed that constructing working venues for commuters in lieu of green spaces is an ideal way. One of the most prominent reasons is that white collars can diminish the time spent on distance movement. It is commonplace for a variety of labours to be postponed by long-distance commutes with several hardship conditions
such
as heavy congestion, disasters, etc. Their productivity can
therefore
be exacerbated owing to the over-spending of stamina on previous travel. These alarming problems can be easily solved to enhance the quality of duties provided that a renovation scheme which focuses mostly on gathering work-building together in the city centre is conducted.
On the other hand
, despite these merits, there is still an abundance of arguments why I support the statement that flattening tranquil sites to create working infrastructure can exert detrimental impacts upon long-haul later lives.
First
and foremost, the diminution in commuting time by covering working places together is just a short-term plan.
This
is since there are only working complexes surrounding the city without other entertainment facilities for relieving stress due to being demolished before. The permanent accumulation of strain can
thus
trigger a cascade of repercussions regarding mental or physical health. In summary, for these aforementioned reasons above, I entirely concur with the idea that reducing travelling time through destroying parks or gardens to build work-buildings as an alternative solution can lead to a myriad of undeserved consequences.
Submitted by pinkanh911 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: