Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. Which solution is better?

Rapid urbanisation has been a global phenomenon for a long, and
this
has caused concern over housing expansion. Some
cities
have tackled
this
problem by constructing high-rise
buildings
whereas expanding the
area
for housing is what other
cities
adopt.
This
essay will discuss both perspectives on
city
development to evaluate which one is better. On the one hand, establishing taller
buildings
can bring about certain benefits in terms of the sustainable development of the
city
.
To begin
with,
this
practice can solve the problem of
land
scarcity which has been a conundrum for national authorities for over a decade. As more and more people are flocking to
cities
in search of job opportunities, the demand for
land
area
required for housing is ever-increasing.
Therefore
, constructing vertical
buildings
emerges as an optimal remedy because they can accommodate a large number of people, yet not take up a too huge
area
.
This
can be exemplified by Manhattan in New york
city
where a multitude of tall apartments has been constructed to meet the demand for accommodations of its citizens.
On the other hand
, building housing on a wider
area
of
land
can certainly offer a few merits. The obvious one is that
city
dweller
Fix the agreement mistake
dwellers
show examples
are provided with wider space which means that they can be able to relish better privacy and design their own houses in accordance with their preferences.
However
, expanding
land
for building houses can take a huge toll on the environment since
this
trend will significantly cut down on the numbers of trees in
cities
, which will lead to poor air pollution as trees help in the effort to absorb an enormous amount of carbon dioxide discharged from vehicles emissions. In conclusion, while both solutions prove their worth depends on the specific circumstances of different
cities
, creating housing areas by providing taller
buildings
is much better than wiping out trees to earn
land
for housing in terms of sustainable
city
development and the quality of the environment.
Submitted by nhuminh031001 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban density
  • sustainability
  • public transportation
  • green spaces
  • community connections
  • overcrowding
  • economic implications
  • infrastructure impact
  • maintenance costs
  • carbon footprint
  • compact city
  • habitat destruction
  • greenhouse gas emissions
What to do next:
Look at other essays: