Some people think that the government should ban dangerous sports, but others think that people should have the freedom to do whatever sport activities they choose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Since the
first
type of sport humankind has invented dozens of competitive activities. Most of them are healthy and handy,
on the other hand
, others could be even dangerous. Should we prohibit the life-threatening ones? I reckon that restrictions are always an unstable means of regulation in that case.
Nonetheless
, let us observe both sides.
Firstly
, the advocates of free will are correct in the terms of our freedom to do anything, that does not bring harm to others. Even suicide is not a crime in most cultures.
Hence
, we can not be prejudiced against extreme sports. I feel that it is impossible to reach positive results with bans and restrictions. If your activity does not interfere with others' rights and freedom, you can act as you want. It is our constitutional privilege. Altogether, the public should find some other way of struggle against harmful sports,
for instance
, an education in the sphere of safety. Maybe the state could remind the possible results of the unpredictable activity for every competitor, who wants to take
such
a risk.
Moreover
, as we all know, usually legal obstacles make something even fancier, and we can easily get the opposite result with the help of laws. Prohibited sports will be even more desirable for risk-lovers.
For example
, illegal boxing matches became more popular than official ones in the USA in the 1960s. Alternatively, the rivals of hazardous competitions are trying to shift public awareness of our safety. It is a sign of the society's evolution,
that is
disturbed and shocked by the news about injuries and deaths because of a lack of precautions. In conclusion, I definitely do not agree with the plan for that disputable ban. Every restriction should be proven legal.
Furthermore
, in
this
case, there is a contradiction with our main rights guaranteed by the constitutions of most countries. We need a soft force of an explanation and education
instead
of government hurdles.
Submitted by me on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: