In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It has been argued that printed newspapers or
books
will be completely replaced by online news
and digital books
in the future so that people
can easily access them without paying. Personally, I do agree with this
opinion for a number of reasons.
To begin
with, the vast majority of people
tend to read current affair
or other publications on their electronic devices because it would be more convenient. From my perspective, they could immediately access the latest reports from online Fix the agreement mistake
affairs
news
outlets during a
day; Correct article usage
the
however
, tabloids should only be bought from newsstands and are just published once a day. Moreover
, most of the books
and online news
are accompanied by related graphical content such
as photos and videos that not only are attention grabbing
,but Add a hyphen
attention-grabbing
also
they would make the comprehension of that text quite straightforward. As a result
, it is imminent that nobody will read printed publications in the upcoming years.
Furthermore
, these digital books
or online news
can significantly contribute to the preservation of our environment and natural resources. In fact, since the paper being used in them are mainly from wood, many forests are annually knocked down to produce them. By deforestation, the ecosystem is likely to be put at risk and consequently
, it threatens many species like plants and animals. In addition
to this
, the aforementioned publications will be converted into waste after they are read by readers that it
can Correct pronoun usage
which
also
cause different problems. For instance
, recycling a huge volume of paper is not only complicated but also
it
needs a large sum.
In conclusion, while some Correct pronoun usage
apply
people
believe that reading conventional books
or newspapers will remain popular amongst people
in the next
years, I would argue that we should rule out its possibility. The rationales are that,
reading them via our devices is not only much easier and attractive but Remove the comma
apply
also
it can protect our forests and environment in conjunction with it is more economical.Submitted by ava.mombeyni on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.