In many workplaces, online communication is becoming more commonplace than face-to-face meetings. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

With the advancement of technology, online

communication

is becoming preferable to face-to-face

meetings

. To a greater extent, I agree with

this

statement due to several reasons which will be discussed in impending paragraphs. To commence with, there are multifarious reasons why the community is taking online

meetings

as an imperative method to do discussion.

First

and foremost, it saves time as well as money. To elaborate, in the past century, mankind could not able to do their

meetings

because of a lack of hours and money due to which they had to encounter many difficulties in that period.

However

, in the contemporary epoch, the public can do their debate on any topic with the help of various apps

such

as zoom and WhatsApp.

Besides

this

, another advantage is that it helps mankind to maintain their relationships with relatives. To clarify, the public can call their relatives who are sitting at any corner of the globe. Due to

this

, they would maintain their relationship in a strong way with the help of these technological

communication

sites.

On the contrary

, there are certain groups of people who vehemently contend that physical

meetings

are still better than virtual

communication

. Primarily, no physical exercise is done by the community. To elucidate, due to the modernization of technology, people do not prefer to go outside to do discussions which would cause a detrimental impact on their health

such

as obesity and laziness.

For instance

, in India, 55% of the population is fatty due to a lack of physical exercise in their daily routine as online

meetings

make their work lucrative in nature. To sum up,

although

non-virtual

meetings

are still popular in some places of the world, non-physical

communication

has many benefits

such

as it save time and remuneration.