2. Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The discussion of who might give the education to juveniles regarding the consequences of

crimes

has always been in the limelight. It is proposed by some that the reformed

ex-prisoners

can best serve

this

role

.

However

, I cannot agree with

this

proposal because reformed ex-offenders may not have specific communication skills to teach

teenagers

, and

instead

,

police

officers are more suitable for

this

role

. On the one hand, well-reintegrated previous offenders may not have the sets of skills to communicate with youngsters about the dangers of committing a crime. Admittedly, it has been suggested that they can offer

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

information about their own sufferings from

crimes

and the damage to their family, which are powerful statements to warn

teenagers

about criminality. Unfortunately/

however

, having knowledge and experience does not necessarily make them good teachers, and not everyone knows how to communicate well with

teenagers

unless they have some training.

Accordingly

, in China, if reformed

ex-prisoners

desire to facilitate educational projects for juveniles, they must obtain the corresponding communication certification.

On the other hand

, many parents and teachers would argue that

police

could better demonstrate the outcomes and preventive measures of

crimes

.

Firstly

, they could not only speak from their own experiences of witnessing the harm to victims

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

provide stories of various

crimes

causing different consequences, along with how to prevent and even stop

crimes

.

Furthermore

,

police

are professionally trained communicators and educators through their training and work, particularly for vulnerable populations like

teenagers

.

For instance

, in Canada, the local policemen work closely with high schools providing ongoing educational sessions about

crimes

, where feedback from students and parents was extremely positive. They sang highly about the sessions as compelling and educational, and more importantly, all speakers know how to deliver information using appropriate languages. In conclusion,

although

reintegrated

ex-prisoners

may use their own experiences to educate

teenagers

about

crimes

’ harm, I strongly believe that they need some training before taking

this

role

, and

police

officers are far better educators on crime topics for

teenagers

audiences. The discussion of who could/might give the best education to juveniles regarding the consequences of

crimes

has always been in the limelight. It is proposed by some that the reformed

ex-prisoners

can best serve

this

role

.

However

, I cannot agree with

this

proposal because

police

officers are more suitable for

this

role

, and having conversations with adolescents requires specific communication skills.