Many
people
feel that unhealthy Use synonyms
food
and drinks should be banned according to research which demonstrates the medical consequences fast Use synonyms
food
causes. I am in disagreement with Use synonyms
this
proposal as I think Linking Words
this
is an individual choice and shouldn’t be mandatory.
Linking Words
Firstly
, there is a lot of research showing that fast Linking Words
food
can increase cardiovascular risk factors due to a large number of additives, sugars and saturated fats. Reducing consumption of these kinds of meals and beverages can significantly decrease the incidence and morbidity of high cholesterol and diabetes, which Use synonyms
further
saves more funding for medical expenses. And with well-established eating habits, the elderly could live better life quality and enjoy their retirement times Linking Words
instead
of staying in hospitals.
Linking Words
However
, it is vital that Linking Words
this
eating habit be the sole choice of everyone, as prohibiting unhealthy meal purchasing may breed resentment towards Linking Words
food
laws. The reason for Use synonyms
this
is that Linking Words
people
are naturally averse to doing anything which seems imposed on them, especially without reward. Use synonyms
Consequently
, Linking Words
this
resentment may Linking Words
then
lead to binge eating and consumption of more harmful meals and beverages. Linking Words
In contrast
, if Linking Words
people
choose to follow instructions from nutritionists, Use synonyms
this
is more likely for their self-discipline and self-monitoring, contributing to their general health. So I think informing the side effects of fast Linking Words
food
is more efficient than prohibiting them simply.
In conclusion, Use synonyms
although
banning unhealthy meals and beverages may help Linking Words
people
improve their health conditions, I believe Use synonyms
such
a policy should not be compulsory as Linking Words
this
may foster negativity towards the laws.Linking Words
dandantotoro