Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is argued whether experts should work in the country where they were educated or they should be free enough to choose their destination.
Although
Linking Words
the obligation to stay in their ancestors' land has some advantages, I firmly believe that they should have the freedom to select their favourite country. On the one hand, having the expectation that literate people work in the region that they have studied is understandable. Society has paid a lot of money for their education, and they have occupied other talented students' places at schools or universities.
Then
Linking Words
, leaving there just for the sake of their own benefits, even though their homeland needs their services, is against ethical principles.
For instance
Linking Words
, many underdeveloped and developing countries are looking for skilled people like engineers, doctors, teachers, nurses, and the like. If they immigrate to other developed areas
for finding
Change preposition
to find
show examples
new jobs, all the public money is wasted.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, forcing professionals to live in a certain region has some individual and social drawbacks.
Firstly
Linking Words
, since they have not opted for that voluntarily, they may experience some negative senses.
For example
Linking Words
, it is more probable that they get various mental and physical illnesses
such
Linking Words
as depression,
blood
Correct word choice
high blood
show examples
pressure, diabetes, cancers, and others.
In particular
Linking Words
, they possibly have suicidal thoughts when there is no suitable possibility for the accomplishment of their dreams and their talents are not appreciated.
Secondly
Linking Words
, society can not exploit their abilities thoroughly. Because there is no motivation to do their jobs enthusiastically. So, both of them waste their time and energy. In conclusion, despite the moral and emotional issues that may necessitate living in the homeland, I think genius graduates should have the required authority to decide where they reside and work.
Submitted by abdali.rog on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your essay does not fully address the prompt. You should discuss both views in more detail and provide a balanced argument. Additionally, ensure that your introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant to the topic.
coherence cohesion
Your essay shows some coherence and cohesion, but it could be improved by organizing your ideas more logically. Ensure that your introduction and conclusion are directly related to the topic and that your supporting points are clearly presented.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • professionals
  • doctors
  • engineers
  • required
  • training
  • home country
  • cultural
  • linguistic
  • advantages
  • economic impact
  • free
  • another country
  • globalization
  • international collaboration
  • improving
  • skills
  • knowledge
  • experience
  • opinion
What to do next:
Look at other essays: