It is argued whether experts should work in the country where they were educated or they should be free enough to choose their destination.
Although
the obligation to stay in their ancestors' land has some advantages, I firmly believe that they should have the freedom to select their favourite country.
On the one hand, having the expectation that literate people work in the region that they have studied is understandable. Society has paid a lot of money for their education, and they have occupied other talented students' places at schools or universities. Linking Words
Then
, leaving there just for the sake of their own benefits, even though their homeland needs their services, is against ethical principles. Linking Words
For instance
, many underdeveloped and developing countries are looking for skilled people like engineers, doctors, teachers, nurses, and the like. If they immigrate to other developed areas Linking Words
for finding
new jobs, all the public money is wasted.
Change preposition
to find
On the other hand
, forcing professionals to live in a certain region has some individual and social drawbacks. Linking Words
Firstly
, since they have not opted for that voluntarily, they may experience some negative senses. Linking Words
For example
, it is more probable that they get various mental and physical illnesses Linking Words
such
as depression, Linking Words
blood
pressure, diabetes, cancers, and others. Correct word choice
high blood
In particular
, they possibly have suicidal thoughts when there is no suitable possibility for the accomplishment of their dreams and their talents are not appreciated. Linking Words
Secondly
, society can not exploit their abilities thoroughly. Because there is no motivation to do their jobs enthusiastically. So, both of them waste their time and energy.
In conclusion, despite the moral and emotional issues that may necessitate living in the homeland, I think genius graduates should have the required authority to decide where they reside and work.Linking Words
abdali.rog