Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

This

is a problem which is being talked up by some with improving machinery, the gap between rich people and poor folks will be increased. One of the biggest reasons is that poor individuals

could not

Wrong verb form

cannot

show examples

buy new models because technological assets improve

fastly

Correct your spelling

fast

show examples

day by day, but other people believe that automation can compound both poor and rich populations. I partly agree with

this

statement because both sides have justified thinking. Both of these viewpoints will be outlined in detail before concluding with my opinion.

To begin

with, most societies can not earn enough money to buy technological appliances in many countries.

For instance

,

although

everybody wants to have a new iPhone, any person who has no money can not buy that.

While

rich societies use new applications for their high-quality phone, poor societies can not. and

hence

, the range between rich and poor classes is increased.

On the other hand

, improving technology prevents discrimination between populations. Because everybody is the same on the internet.

For example

, in the past few, days Justin Bieber

-a

Correct your spelling

a

show examples

renowned singer-sang a song in the metaverse. Normally, if the metaverse didn't exist the public who are dying to watch him have to give money.

Therefore

there is no difference between poor and rich. In my opinion, hi-tech provides many various opportunities for all humans and

also

gratis.

To sum up

, the range of technology currently available may be looked at negatively by

few

Correct article usage

a few

show examples

individuals because of the increasing gap between the poor and the rich individuals but actually, it has many different benefits.