Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now “one big traffic jam”. How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?

In the past three decades, vehicles have been made very convenient which is the reason it has increased tremendously in many cities giving the world a big
traffic
jam problem. It is very much true in
this
modern world where every individual has the freedom to own a car. In a
further
paragraph, it is explained in detail with an instance to reduce it by the government by implementing some measures. In
this
modern era, every individual would like to have a high-class life and not struggle
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
and spend time dependent on public
transport
.
In addition
to that owning a vehicle is so easy and convenient, thanks to many new manufacturing companies making cars which is so affordable even for the middle class with the most favourable options.
For example
, Suzuki Ertiga is one the cheapest and most affordable motors in India even for a 7seater. Many people in India tend to buy Ertiga simply because it is big, spacious, fuel economy and most a status of having a big car. It’s not only a Suzuki but many other companies in many other countries have similar options and even ones better.
Furthermore
, with an instance having said above there has been a potential growth in the sale of cars and
as a result
heavy
traffic
jam. It was a time when only metropolitan cities had
traffic
jams but in today’s ,world we find the same even in rural areas. Since it is a very big concern, the government shall definitely take some remedial measures to control the
traffic
by implementing more and more public
transport
facilities with utmost convenience, facilities inside the bus, offers to buy tickets, and entertainment on buses like television.
In addition
to
this
,
transport
authorities can
also
think of launching metros in many places.
For example
: If Government introduces more routes and connectivity options in a city, reduce fares and introduce more fines for car users with different clauses to maintain and drive cars on road, which will force an individual to use public transportation than using their own vehicle. To conclude, it is very true, in fact increasing the problem of the
traffic
jam from past thirty years in many cities of the earth and is an unavoidable problem but the public sector should impose more type of fines for motor users with limited freedom to drive, on the other ,hand make public
transport
so very convenient with utmost facilities and preference for every individual which will definitely encourage to get towards the public transportation.
Submitted by syeda naureen on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • traffic congestion
  • commute times
  • pollution
  • car purchases
  • fuel prices
  • congestion charges
  • public transportation infrastructure
  • subsidies
  • incentives
  • electric vehicles
  • alternative modes of transportation
  • cycling
  • walking
  • dedicated lanes
  • pathways
  • sustainable options
  • educational campaigns
  • environmental impacts
  • health impacts
  • behavioral change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: