In some areas of the US, a curfew is imposed in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. what is your opinion about this?

The curfew is inflicted in specific areas of the US and

teenagers

are obligated to stay indoors at night unless they are gone along by an adult.

However

, their freedom is limited but they could be safe

instead

.

Therefore

, in my

opinion

Add a comma

,opinion

show examples

this

could be useful in unsafe areas to make

parents

confident their children be secure. In spite of development in some countries

such

as the US, the security of children is one of the crucial issues yet what is mentioned by plenty of politicians.

Additionally

, it is alleged

that is

completely personal and

parents

are managed to control them in their own way. Whereas, keeping

teenagers

indoors is considered by pupils.

For instance

, in quiet states

such

as Seattle, the criminal threshold is utterly higher than

others

Change preposition

in others

show examples

.

Furthermore

, it could well help

parents

to be sure their youths are safe.

On the other hand

,

teenagers

are supposed to behave less aggressive when they are with an adult and they would be under control.

In addition

,

this

could well a fruitful way to keep high-risk children.

For example

, in areas where criminal behaviours among youth are numerously higher than in others,

this

approach would be effective. To sum up, I absolutely reckon

this

way is not the best one which would exist, but it is a good deed what

parents

are convinced their

teenagers

be safe in the

hazard

Replace the word

hazardous

show examples

area.

However

, governments must make attempt to change

this

situation even if their freedom would be not limited. In point out of fact, freedom should be

also

considered.