It is impossible to help all people around the world in need so governments should focus on people from their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Countless people today have recommended that

governments

should prioritise supporting their own people over donating overseas. I strongly agree with

this

statement as global

involvements

Fix the agreement mistake

involvement

show examples

generally

do

Correct subject-verb agreement

does

show examples

more harm than good, and

governments

get better control regarding national help.

First

, foreign help could be a bit difficult for every nation to acquire. Amidst the ones that are facilitated by external relief, a majority of nations either end up misusing the contributions or become overly reliant on them. A good instance of

this

would be the assistance sent to numerous African countries during times of public chaos. Certain dishonest

governments

would often control the aid, whether food supplies or financial support, to preserve their autocratic position. Even in the occasional cases where help reaches its planned targets without intrusion from

governments

or non-governmental organisations, there is a strong probability of establishing a dependency. People usually profit more long-term from developing features related to self-reliance rather than becoming submissive in a dependent relationship.

Furthermore

,

governments

can impact their own population better. There is an array of techniques that these authorities can choose,

for example

, subsidizing a comprehensive social government assistance net, letting individuals keep a greater amount of their tax money, and more. A good illustration of

this

would be in China where the public authority has colossal influence over both public and private elements.

This

guarantees that their help isn't abused and that it upholds really weak fragments of the populace. Their oversight and information on their own nation

means

Change the verb form

mean

show examples

a more productive allotment of assets, and

this

applies for the most part to

governments

all around the world.

Although

contributing to the global economy periodically is acceptable, it’s better if it does not become a habit. All in

all

Add a comma

,all

show examples

governments

can mediate most successfully in their own countries.

Consequently

, unfamiliar assistance ought to be restricted to situations of outrageous emergency.