Nowadays, it is run of the mill for nations to consume sustenances
originatedWrong verb form
show examples
from different parts of the world. While some might praise
strategy, there are others who would cast doubt on its efficiency. The essay below will shed light on both sides and give reasons for my conclusion that the cons outweigh the bros.
On the one hand, utilizing outer sources of
would be efficacious in reinforcing the
security of a nation. To explain
, the importation of
is tantamount to less consumption of national
, helping maximize the amount of
the government can set aside for unexpected situations in which
demand abruptly skyrockets.
, importation gives concrete assurances of fewer chances of famine or
deprivation, which
prevent untoward atrocities for the competition of
supply.
, during the COVID-19 pandemic,
the Correct article usage
show examples
worldwide trade had to be stopped to prevent
from overseas and
could only satisfy the nutritional needs of their people by previously saved domestic sources of
before receiving aid afterwards. After all, it is the
security of
that would be ensured thanks to the integration of outer sources into the national market.
, imported
would create some detrimental impacts on the
agricultureReplace the word
show examples
situation of a nation by intensifying the competition
ofChange preposition
show examples
the
race. The availability of exotic sustenances is likely to result in the fragmented consumption of local products as buyers have more choices.
, in order to compete, farmers and retailers might put on an overly low price for their products, leading to the incapability of
the Correct article usage
show examples
national agriculture to make any profit or
developmentsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. What is more, the transportation of imported goods is
beset with a fair share of health-related problems. During
process, it is unfeasible to control and prevent the deterioration of
nutritionalCorrect article usage
show examples
values of
due to evaporation. Not only the use of conservative chemicals is extortionate, but it
calls into question the safety and freshness of foreign
. All in all,
importation may put
at a disadvantage by overburdening the local business as well as jeopardizing consumers with added substances if surpassing the permissible amount.
In conclusion, international
trade is evidently a negative development due to the damages it brings upon
both in terms of
agricultureReplace the word
show examples
development and the well-being of the community.
, governments should limit their national
export in the near future with a view to optimizing the benefits and sidestepping the pitfalls.