Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.

Nowadays, many

people

prefer tourist

places

where the situation is immensely harsh. There are pros and cons to

such

locations. The below paragraphs will discuss both of these arguments. There are a plethora of advantages for tourists who go to visit these areas where conditions are tough to survive.

Firstly

, air and noise pollution are under control due to limited industries and transportation.

As a result

,

people

get very clean air and feel relaxed.

Secondly

,

people

like challenges and want to live in natural habitats. Owing to

this

,they want to get something

newexperience

Correct your spelling

new experience

experience

and explore the hidden

places

where they can do adventure activities which are not heard of or seen anywhere in the world.

For example

, many families build a tent and live under the night sky in the Sahara desert .

On the other hand

, there are

also

drawbacks when an individual goes as a tourist. These types of

places

are isolated, have harsh weather and are very limited in connectivity from the other part of the world. Due to

this

, in case of any emergency, any medical aid will not be immediately available.

Moreover

, the infrastructure facilities are extremely less.

Such

places

are often risky and chances of natural calamities are very possible.

Hence

, there is a life threat for tourists who plan to explore.

For instance

, during the year 2019, many nations warned their population to avoid visiting

such

tourist

places

considering their criticality. To conclude, it is evident from the above summary that each merit and demerits have some strength and significance,

nevertheless

,

people

should be careful while selecting

such

places

to visit.