A growing population is a big problem in many countries. Should the government provide new homes in the cities or countryside?

There is a number of

countries

where the population is considered the major problem whereas many developed

nations

have already solved

this

issue. I believe that new buildings might be a way to deal with

this

problem but several other measures can be taken to alleviate

this

trouble. To commence with, it can be seen in many developed

nations

that they are handling

this

issue without making new houses.

Firstly

, they are educating the residents about what consequences can be in the community if they do not plan for kids.

For example

, no more than two kids are the trend in China and they are rewarding the public if they have less than two children.

As a result

, in the

last

few decades, china which was the

first

country in the world that had billions of residents now decreased to

third

place.

Secondly

, of course, it can not be ignored that building new dwellings is an effective approach but only for those

countries

that have enough land, as smaller

countries

like Sri Lanka cannot even think about making shelters because they do not have sufficient land.

On the other hand

, many developed

countries

such

as Canada and America have a lot of available space,

therefore

, they can either build skyscrapers in cities or can

also

construct houses in rural areas.

Lastly

, various

countries

facing population problems can

also

start living together without making new houses which will increase the bonding of family and love. In conclusion, while rich

nations

are financially strong and they

also

have enough land to build new apartments, developing

nations

should encourage their citizens toward birth control and birth prevention to solve

this

difficulty.