some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit. What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?

While
a vast majority of people suggest that it would be wise to deal with environmental issues at a global level, there are others who believe that dealing with them on a national scale would be an appropriate idea.
This
essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth.I,
however
, think that all nations should come forward to tackle these issues. To commence with, some people claim that concerns related to the surroundings should be solved by the countries throughout the world simultaneously.
This
is so because most of the topics pertaining to the environment are adversely affecting the whole universe and they cannot be tackled simply by working alone,
thus
it is the need of the hour to come together to minimise the potential impacts of these serious threats.The United Nations,
for instance
, is working on an agreement to reduce the temperature of the earth by approximately 2% by 2021.
This
policy is signed since it is well known that global warming is responsible for changing the current climatic conditions of our planet.To recapitulate, it would not be wrong to say that the time has come when each country should cooperate to lessen the dreadful outcomes of the changes in the atmospheric phenomenon.
In contrast
, the opponents argue that the individual role of the nations is crucial in the elimination of the processes which are destroying the beauty of our planet.Since no country can take a back seat, and think that it is a global concern, they cannot do anything.Despite
this
,effective initiatives at an individual level can prove significant.In India,
for example
, the use of plastic bags has been banned in order to minimise garbage production as these are non -biodegradable and can never be degraded, which is definitely an excellent decision taken by the government.To elucidate, no one can deny the participation of a single nation as a whole. In conclusion,
although
society is divided into the methods of solving ecological issues.Some are in favour of mitigating them in collaboration,
whereas
others consider alleviating
such
problems nationally.But, I personally opine that these can be best resolved by taking a balanced approach.
Submitted by pavan sai kumar janga on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Improve logical structure by organizing ideas in a more coherent and connected manner.
task achievement
The response addresses the task but lacks depth and thoroughness. Provide a more detailed and comprehensive analysis of both sides of the argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • ecosystems
  • interconnectivity
  • Paris Agreement
  • tailored solutions
  • enforce
  • regulations
  • consensus
  • multi-level approach
  • empower
  • international collaboration
What to do next:
Look at other essays: