Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?

It is a known fact that nowadays authorities of most cities encourage builders to develop
buildings
in
such
a way, that they will be able to give as many places as they could, and one of the obvious solutions is just to make
buildings
look like skyscrapers. Only a little number of cities have laws that deny constructing
buildings
of more than several floors.
Although
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
I have spent all my childhood in
such
a place in the countryside in a two-storey building and still have warm memories about it, I truly believe that the future is high-rise
buildings
and that
this
solution is much better than shallow development.
First
of all, constructing tall
buildings
is not only about places where
people
live, it is
also
about how they would live. Let me explain
:
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
when the city architect decides that some
area
should be developed, he decided
also
how
people
would commute to their work (infrastructure planning), where they should leave their kids (kindergarten placing), how
people
would spend their leisure activity (parks, cinemas, theatres, etcetera), and so one. As you can see, in that way could be improved all the city, not only one small
area
.
Secondly
, if there are a lot of
people
in a particular
area
, many places take care of them. Many businesses have been opened just to help
people
to solve their everyday problems. So, the more inhabitants live in the neighbourhood, the more entrepreneurs could be grown there to provide dwellers with more services.
Consequently
, when cities create housing areas of
this
type, the government helps to improve the economy of the country. Despite the fact that a lot of
people
prefer to live in the countryside with the wider
area
of land, our lives could be improved dramatically thanks to dense tall
buildings
and
people
who live there.
Submitted by shpona86 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban density
  • sustainability
  • public transportation
  • green spaces
  • community connections
  • overcrowding
  • economic implications
  • infrastructure impact
  • maintenance costs
  • carbon footprint
  • compact city
  • habitat destruction
  • greenhouse gas emissions
What to do next:
Look at other essays: