Government should regulate the level of violence in films in the television and in cinema. Some think they should not be regulated. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, the entertainment industry is reasonably gaining lots of attention and has sparked many debates as well. The major targets of these

movies

are the citizens. They give lots of messages which use to have positive and negative impacts on people. Some believe that the government should control and regulate the level of violence present in cinemas.

In contrast

, others think that it should not be. Personally, I'm in complete agreement with the

first

statement.

However

, the expository paragraphs will expatiate both viewpoints with lucid examples & conclude with my opinion.

To begin

with, the most indispensable fact is that

movies

have become a gateway to learning. They are creating a huge impression on the livelihood of humans.

For example

, the stunts shown in cinema are imitated by young children and can be injurious.

Subsequently

, many times

false

Add an article

the false

show examples

language used in them is incorrect.

Therefore

, the government should supervise these acts to avoid the negative impact.

Nevertheless

, they are certain

movies

, whose concepts should be expressed through a variety of actions. In fact, there are groups of people who like these

movies

. In conclusion, it's good regulatory bodies are formulated to check scenes of

movies

& accrediting them with grades.

Therefore

, people should entertain those cinemas which are forecasting good messages.

Additionally

, they should

also

weigh up & see who should be allowed to enjoy it, like children should be restrained from stunts or A-grade

movies

.