Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In recent decades, the benefits of investing time and

money

in

animals

cannot be denied.

However

, some people suggest that spending

money

on people is more important, and they discourage the

government

to stop investing, claiming that

such

investments do not have value. I disagree with

such

an extreme view and think that authorities should find the right balance towards the conservation of

wildlife

.

First

of all, wild

animals

have a vital role in sustaining ecological balance and biodiversity. In the past, these

animals

have been the key parts of food chains,

thus

maintaining lives on Earth.

For instance

, if predators like tigers and lions were disappearing,

this

would lead to the death of prey like deer, rabbits and so on. Most importantly, the former plays an important role, as hunters, in stimulating the surviving abilities of the latter in the wild environment.

Although

I strongly disagree with the idea that

government

should not spend

money

on

wildlife

, I see why some people may have

this

negative attitude toward some measures taken by the

government

such

as conducting seminars in the name of creating awareness

instead

of protecting

animals

. Another problem may arise if

money

spending on unnecessary costs which comes from different organisations.

However

, these are not sufficient reasons for authorities to forbid investing towards

wildlife

altogether.

Instead

, volunteers can be assigned to various institutions to protect the life of wild

animals

. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the statement that spending more

money

and time on

wildlife

conservation is useless, as I believe they are necessary for protecting the environment and human-life balance.

However

, I do acknowledge that some measures taken by the

government

have less impact, and

thus

government

should take necessary steps to prevent them.