Introduction
Freedom including speech is one of the most fundamental rights for every citizen. Artists who inspire society through their creativity are encouraged to be free to use literature, pictures, lyrics, and movies without the authority limit. I;
however
, disagree with Linking Words
this
perspective because of the below reasons.Linking Words
Body paragraph 1
My
first
justification is that a writer or a song composer is not an ordinary citizen thanks to their influence on the public. It is no exaggeration to say that their work like a best-selling book might, to some extent, change the readers' viewpoint along with the writer's opinion. Linking Words
Therefore
, these creators should be exclusively treated by the government, compared with others.Linking Words
Body paragraph 2
Another reason is the appropriateness of the artwork. It is an unfortunate fact that not all creative things are suitable to society's values or age. A bomb film with high rates seems to be unhealthy for preschoolers with scenes of full violence and racial discrimination
for instance
. In Linking Words
this
case, censorship by authorized departments plays a vital role in preventing vulnerable subjects from bad behaviours.Linking Words
Body paragraph 3
Last
but not least, a considerable number of artisans tend to insert their real-life experiences into their pieces of artwork making up pessimistic thoughts. These widespread quickly to their fans who are negatively impacted. Linking Words
For example
, listening to a gloomy song is apparent to neither have optimistic prospects of life nor contentment. Linking Words
As a result
, creative work should be submitted to the authority before publication.Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, I contend that artists should be regularly censored by the authority to make sure ideas going to convey to the community are appropriate; and
this
censorship should be deliberate to let imagination be alive.Linking Words