Some people argue that companies and private individuals, rather than governments, should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Pollution

and its cost of removal have become one of the most international and arguable topics. Some people believe that manufacturers and

individuals

have to be responsible for the disposal expenses more than the government. I totally agree with

this

statement and I will discuss the reasons in

this

essay. Some reasons show the importance of

companies

’ and

individuals

' engagement in

pollution

disposal.

Companies

and

individuals

play a vital role in producing

pollution

articles in order to industrial activities and personal life. From high amounts of chemical gasses to piled-up plastic bags, all are on the top of contamination.

In addition

, the high-priced methods, exciting for disposal, should not be ignored.

Hence

if

companies

and

individuals

engage with the process, they will be encouraged to lessen their

pollution

production to pay less money.

For instance

,

companies

may prefer to update their machine to fewer toxic gasses producers and

individuals

may use fabric bags

instead

of plastic ones.

However

, a complete adaptation of

companies

in disposal expenses can lead to negative effects on society.

Firstly

, if

companies

pay too much money on cleaning up their

pollution

, they might increase the price of their product in order to demand their money.

Consequently

, people from all walks of life are not able to afford all their needs.

Furthermore

,

this

payment can cause

companies

to abstain from paying tax which can significantly decrease the quality of utilities that are improved by taxes like transportation and hospitals.

Hence

it can have negative effects in terms of privilege. In conclusion, the engagement of manufacturers and

individuals

in cleaning up payments has several positive effects which outweigh the negative points.

Therefore

I agree with the idea.