Many people say that eating out in restaurant is better for the individual and the family than cooking and eating at home. Do you agree or disagree?

Since

people

are becoming wealthier, and certain youth are unable to cook, they consider eating at

home

not as good as that in restaurants. In my view, Having a meal at

home

is healthier but dining outside is more pleasurable.

To begin

with, eating a meal outside is not suitable for daily life because is expensive. To explain, restaurants require additional costs for their service

such

as preparing and serving the

food

so is not convenient.

For instance

, if an individual wants to eat pasta, the cost of preparing it at

home

is around three euros while consuming it at a restaurant will increase about to twelve euros.

hence

, it means that opt for the former one the individual will save nine units of cash.

On the other hand

, consuming

food

in a restaurant is a pleasurable and comfortable experience. To elaborate, going out to eat means that

people

do not need to make any efforts

such

as

buy

Wrong verb form

buying

show examples

food

, and ingredients, and washing dishes, which, especially for youngsters is a very annoying process. Another advantage is that restaurants could prepare

food

that individuals hardly make at

home

.

For instance

, Chinese, Japanese, and Indian

food

are difficult to prepare by ourselves, and in

this

case,

instead

of learning the cookbook is more convenient to eat in a proper place. In conclusion, eating at

home

or outside has pros and cons. In my opinion,

people

should strike a balance between these two alternatives. Since

food

prepared at

home

is healthier and cheaper it should be the daily choice, and the other one is adapted for once a week,

that is

to say when

people

feel lazy and want just to enjoy the

food

.