Some people believe that to reduce the amount of time people spend commuting (travelling to work), parks and gardens close to city centres should be replaced by apartment buildings for commuters to live in. However, others disagree with this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There has been a debate among
people
who think it is beneficial for us to destroy parks and gardens and build accomodations
for workers who commute to Correct your spelling
accommodations
accommodation
city
centres and those who against
Add a missing verb
are against
this
idea. While this
approach gives more flexibility for time and money to a limited number of city
commuters, overall, I believe the idea does not improve total
satisfaction of the Correct article usage
the total
people
belonging to the society.
First
of all, it is obvious that if we built mass flats for men and women working in the urban areas where currently public open spaces exist, for those limited number of people
who can get into the housing, it would become extremely convenient. For instance
, they can commute to work with less time and cost and that would become a significant advantage for them. However
, the number of people
who are lucky enough to enjoy the merits are
limited. Correct subject-verb agreement
is
Thus
, those who cannot live in the
rooms in the centre of metropolitan areas need to continue Correct article usage
apply
traveling
Change the spelling
travelling
everyday
. Clearly, the total elevation of quality of life is not huge.
Replace the word
every day
On the contrary
, by
destroying public relaxation places Change preposition
apply
such
as parks and gardens will significantly downgrade the environment of the city
as a whole. For example
, trees and ponds will be replaced by flat buildings and people
lose places for walks and play grounds
where they can enjoy holidays. Correct your spelling
playgrounds
In addition
, the landscape of the urban area would become less attractive and the value of the place may be decreased and it would even impact the price of the lands Correct your spelling
nearby
near by
.
Admittedly there are some pros and cons to Correct your spelling
nearby
the
both Remove the article
apply
side
of the Fix the agreement mistake
sides
arguments
, Fix the agreement mistake
argument
however
, as a conclusion from above
observations, I believe Correct article usage
the above
this
idea of replacing public leasure
lands Correct your spelling
leisure
to
Change preposition
with
accomodations
for Correct your spelling
accommodations
city
workers is overall not wise, considering the significant drawbacks it may cause to the entire people
living in the area.Submitted by michima2011 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!