Some people argue that companies and private individuals, rather than governments, should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Huge amounts of

waste

Use synonyms

produced every day pose a great threat to human life and the

environment

Use synonyms

.

This

Linking Words

raises the question as to whose duty it is to pay for

waste

Use synonyms

collection services; the local

governments

Use synonyms

or the

companies

Use synonyms

and

individuals

Use synonyms

who produced them. It only seems reasonable to expect the main polluters to fund the costs.

Corporations

Use synonyms

and private sections contribute extensively to pollution,

hence

Linking Words

should pay for the damage they cause. The outcomes of

this

Linking Words

proposal are twofold.

Firstly

Linking Words

, only by making

companies

Use synonyms

finance the

waste

Use synonyms

treatment process will they be motivated to let go of their old ways and adopt more environmentally friendly procedures,

thus

Linking Words

reducing the amount of

waste

Use synonyms

and in turn the costs of

waste

Use synonyms

disposal;

for example

Linking Words

by using renewable fuels or sustainable materials in their products, packaging and even marketing.

Secondly

Linking Words

, doing so will take the burden off the

government

Use synonyms

’s shoulders, as they are normally considered the sole body responsible for funding the

waste

Use synonyms

disposal process. Shifting the responsibility to

corporations

Use synonyms

and private

individuals

Use synonyms

,

however

Linking Words

,

governments

Use synonyms

can allocate the budget to other essential sections

such

Linking Words

as infrastructure or healthcare, which would help society prosper more.

Thus

Linking Words

, forcing

companies

Use synonyms

and

individuals

Use synonyms

to fund the costs of

waste

Use synonyms

collection and disposal would assist the

government

Use synonyms

financially and help protect the

environment

Use synonyms

.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, to some,

governments

Use synonyms

should solely be responsible for financing the pollution clean-up.

This

Linking Words

may be true as

corporations

Use synonyms

and non-state industries are already paying huge sums in taxes every year, so it seems only natural to expect the local

governments

Use synonyms

to fund the pollution-cleaning process. Should the

government

Use synonyms

pose huge amounts of taxes on

companies

Use synonyms

and obligate them to pay for the

waste

Use synonyms

treatment as well,

companies

Use synonyms

will feel swindled and robbed.

This

Linking Words

, of course, would lead to nothing but the rise in discontentment in society and perhaps tax evasion as a path of reconciliation. Having said that, large

corporations

Use synonyms

receive

government

Use synonyms

subsidies, and

thus

Linking Words

should be held accountable for their own pollution.

For example

Linking Words

, in case of an oil spill in the ocean, the

government

Use synonyms

should not be responsible for providing resources;

that is

Linking Words

the oil company’s responsibility to clean it up and compensate for the possible damages. The

government

Use synonyms

’s role here is to make sure there are laws in place that will protect the public’s health and the

environment

Use synonyms

, and that these laws are adhered to by the company at fault. So,

corporations

Use synonyms

and

individuals

Use synonyms

seem to be the ones who should pay for the disposal of the garbage they produce. In conclusion, I agree with

this

Linking Words

proposal.

Although

Linking Words

this

Linking Words

statement might

initially

Linking Words

be hard to implement, and some may resist the idea, in the long run, it will benefit everyone from the

government

Use synonyms

to

corporations

Use synonyms

and of course the

environment

Use synonyms

and nation.