Some people argue that companies and private individuals, rather than governments, should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Huge amounts of
waste
produced every day pose a great threat to human life and the environment
. This
raises the question as to whose duty it is to pay for waste
collection services; the local governments
or the companies
and individuals
who produced them. It only seems reasonable to expect the main polluters to fund the costs.
Corporations
and private sections contribute extensively to pollution, hence
should pay for the damage they cause. The outcomes of this
proposal are twofold. Firstly
, only by making companies
finance the waste
treatment process will they be motivated to let go of their old ways and adopt more environmentally friendly procedures, thus
reducing the amount of waste
and in turn the costs of waste
disposal; for example
by using renewable fuels or sustainable materials in their products, packaging and even marketing. Secondly
, doing so will take the burden off the government
’s shoulders, as they are normally considered the sole body responsible for funding the waste
disposal process. Shifting the responsibility to corporations
and private individuals
, however
, governments
can allocate the budget to other essential sections such
as infrastructure or healthcare, which would help society prosper more. Thus
, forcing companies
and individuals
to fund the costs of waste
collection and disposal would assist the government
financially and help protect the environment
.
Nevertheless
, to some, governments
should solely be responsible for financing the pollution clean-up. This
may be true as corporations
and non-state industries are already paying huge sums in taxes every year, so it seems only natural to expect the local governments
to fund the pollution-cleaning process. Should the government
pose huge amounts of taxes on companies
and obligate them to pay for the waste
treatment as well, companies
will feel swindled and robbed. This
, of course, would lead to nothing but the rise in discontentment in society and perhaps tax evasion as a path of reconciliation. Having said that, large corporations
receive government
subsidies, and thus
should be held accountable for their own pollution. For example
, in case of an oil spill in the ocean, the government
should not be responsible for providing resources; that is
the oil company’s responsibility to clean it up and compensate for the possible damages. The government
’s role here is to make sure there are laws in place that will protect the public’s health and the environment
, and that these laws are adhered to by the company at fault. So, corporations
and individuals
seem to be the ones who should pay for the disposal of the garbage they produce.
In conclusion, I agree with this
proposal. Although
this
statement might initially
be hard to implement, and some may resist the idea, in the long run, it will benefit everyone from the government
to corporations
and of course the environment
and nation.Submitted by mahjoubitina on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!