Some people believe that the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?

In

this

contemporary epoch, the relationship between environmental problems and fuel prices has become a controversial argument. Whilst some proponents emphasize that the increased value of

petrol

plays a quintessential role in preserving the eco-system, some opponents and I hold a diverse stance because

this

development may lead to economic stagnation, along with putting some financial burdens on residents' shoulders. In

this

essay, my contention will be

further

elaborated. To embark on, despite the fact that overpopulation is the cause of global warming, the significant rise in fuel expenses does not help in tackling environmental issues because

this

may lead to economic recession.

This

means that when authorities bring up the cost of

oil

, citizens will not be able to curtail their dependence on

petrol

. An eminent example of

this

is Egypt where the dramatic hike in

oil

expenses has not reduced the overconsumption by drivers.

Therefore

,what can be said is that the surged

oil

costs will result in a reduction in the productivity rate.

Furthermore

, exaggerated

oil

prices will affect the financial status of the overwhelming majority of citizens.

In other words

, if civilians are exposed to surged expenses,

this

will put fiscal pressure on commuters, and they will not be able to cover their essential needs.

This

can be witnessed in Egypt where locals suffer from unrealistic

petrol

costs.

Accordingly

, in a final analysis, authorities should consider different procedures to mitigate environmental problems. In conclusion, after

this

essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that not only does the rise in

petrol

expenditures will lead to economic recession, but

also

this

will affect people's financial position. Eventually, I am convinced that other measures should be implemented to conserve the ecosystem.