Some people suggest that children do not understand the world of work and schools should make all teenagers spend a short time working as well as studying academic subjects. To what extent do you agree?

There are some who claim that if the school syllabus includes hands-on experiences , pupils can understand what having a job would be like. I totally disagree with the given point , even though there is a number of supporting reasons. There are main subjects that children should learn

such

as literacy and numeracy rather than spending time with employees . Educational institutions that are at the top of the list require a high level of academic performance. For being admitted to

such

universities schoolchildren should learn the basic skills of reading academic papers and understanding basic maths tasks.

Additionally

, all tertiaries want that their current students can carry out research for that reason basic knowledge that was gained at school would be better for schoolchildren's experiences.

Furthermore

, children are only able to be collateral

ovservers

Correct your spelling

observers

servers

, while they participate in workers' working processes that the

last

would not be fully understandable for young practitioners.

Also

, by just observing different professional fields pupils would misunderstand the benefits and drawbacks of a profession that

last

in its turn could lead not to having the right career choice.

For instance

, while working with a medical worker children might accept it as the hardest job

as a result

of a lack of knowledge and skills. To conclude , people think that schoolchildren have to join

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

employees for a better understanding of their responsibilities

instead

of concentrating on academic lessons. I am of the opinion that it is a negative trend while there are other skills that teenagers should learn and

spending

Change the verb form

spend

show examples

time as a worker can mislead them.