Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some poeple think that interviews is not a reliable mthod of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

For a very long time,
interviews
are the most common and spread method of selection at almost all companies.
However
, many people believe that
interviews
are not
right
Add an article
a right
the right
show examples
and appropriate way to select employees, and there are other better methods to choose them. I tend to trust traditional and tested methods everywhere, so I disagree with
them
Correct pronoun usage
those
show examples
who dislike the interview method. Because
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
there are several factors which confirm that
interviews
are reliable.
Firstly
, it is proven that at
interviews
,
interviewer
Add an article
the interviewer
an interviewer
show examples
can check not only
technical
Correct article usage
the technical
show examples
knowledge of
employee
Add an article
the employee
show examples
, but
also
his communication skills, stress tolerance, and his suitability for
company
Add an article
the company
show examples
. Because
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
interviewer
Add an article
the interviewer
an interviewer
show examples
can do anything,
for instance
: give
test
Fix the agreement mistake
tests
show examples
, questions or just have a conversation with
employee
Add an article
an employee
the employee
show examples
. It fully reveals
person
Correct article usage
a person
show examples
and allows
to
Correct pronoun usage
us to
show examples
find out all the necessary qualities.
However
,
interview
Add an article
the interview
an interview
show examples
may not show the all skills of
employee
Add an article
the employee
an employee
show examples
, but a lot of companies conduct an internship after
interview
Add an article
the interview
an interview
show examples
, where
company
Correct article usage
the company
show examples
fully understand is the person appropriate for them.
Submitted by tima.saga28 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: