Some people say that using animals to test new products for human consumption should be banned in all countries. To what extent do you agree? Give clear arguments and examples to state your stance.

It is true that medicines and some other products are tested using animal

experiments

in many countries before using for

humans

. While I tend to forward the viewpoint that using animal testing is wrong from an ethical perspective. I would agree that these

experiments

for developing medicines are helpful for human lives.

To begin

with, many people argue that using animal testing is morally wrong and should be banned. One example of

this

is using laboratory mice to try some new drugs, it may be given an illness to be sure the effectiveness of the medicine is measured.

In addition

,

this

activity is repeated many times. Opponents of using animal testing believe that

this

activity is evil. They suppose that the benefits of

humans

should not be based on the suffering of animals and that all lives of creatures should be respected.

Humans

have no right to treat animals like that and scientists need to find alternative solutions.

On the other hand

, alternative solutions are not always available. In many circumstances, researchers need to use animals for testing a new drug to make sure it is safe for

humans

. In reality, many vaccines and drugs are developed through animal

experiments

. Supporters of using animal testing suppose that using a limited number of mice for experimentation is acceptable because

this

research can save human lives. I personally agree with the ban on using animal experimentation for non-medical purposes,

however

, I think it is necessary to use

this

method for important medical testing. In conclusion, it seems to me that using animal

experiments

for important medical research should not be banned until scientists find alternative solutions.