Providing a national system in a country where the unemployed receive a regular payment only encourages people not to seek work and puts an unreasonable strain on a country’s financial resources. Discuss this statement and give your opinion.

The

unemployment

stream in some countries makes the governments create a public

system

to pay

money

to every unemployeds continuously.

However

, there are a lot of critics who disagree with

this

decision because they say

this

system

cause destroys the financial resources of the nation due to decreasing in people's motivation for working.

First

of all, the government should be considered an organization that has a number of responsibilities to improve people's well-being.

Accordingly

, one of the most important problems that governments are faced is

unemployment

.

Therefore

, creating a

system

for paying

money

to the people who lose their jobs or are between jobs, can be a wise decision because

unemployment

is a major social disorder that can have a large number of consequences.

For example

, a worker who lost his job has to tackle a lot of difficulties to make a living , so, it is possible that he starts doing illegal activities for making

money

.

On the other hand

,

such

a financial

system

definitely has a massive negative impact on the government's resources.

Moreover

,

this

regular payment causes an immense amount of receivers to have not enough motive to look for or find a new job.

In addition

,

this

is not a financial solution to struggling with

unemployment

. In my, opinion, governments can allocate many interest-free loans to create jobs through entrepreneurs. In conclusion, all the treatments that are considered by national organizations, undoubtedly have both positive and negative effects on society or other parts like the economy.

Subsequently

, spending directly

money

on the unemployed or job seekers perhaps can be the

last

choice, which is why its negative consequences surely are as much as the expectations.