Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

The global

Correct article usage

Global

show examples

change is getting worse, and a lot of governments don'

t

seem that interested in it. They just don'

t

realise how big the problem is

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and think that the entire planet needs to start doing things against it

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and push it away from themselves

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because they believe that environmental problems can only be solved on a global scale. But is

this

true? Is it useless to cope with it on a national scale? It is true that

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

environmental issues are a global problem. But that doesn'

t

mean that we should ignore those nationwide, quite the opposite. If nobody starts doing something against it, nobody will. And every

country

needs to do its part

to

Change preposition

for

show examples

it, we all need to work together for that.

For example

, every

country

needs to get its own climate aims done. If every

country

concentrates on their issues, things will get better with time. But to be in

capacity

Add an article

a capacity

the capacity

show examples

to set the right goals it is important to see the global scale. If we don'

t

know what exactly are the problems, we can'

t

get to work on them.

This

could

for example

be done through international conferences, like the COP that happens every year.

That is

then

how international goals are created. To conclude, we need to have a global view

to

Change preposition

of

show examples

what needs to be done and create goals per

country

. That's how we can

then

all concentrate on our problems and try to solve

it

Correct pronoun usage

them

show examples

, in order to have a global result that helps the ecosystems.