Money should be spent on creating new buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

Government should spend public money on wise and economically viable projects.

However

, it might be not acceptable when funds are spent on creating new

buildings

.

Hence

I don't completely agree with the argument that revenue expenditure should be on new

buildings

instead

of renovating them. Let's discuss the issue in detail in the following passages. Income received from tax and other means should be primarily used for the overall welfare. constructing new

buildings

for museums, and town halls involves large amounts and comparatively costs more than renovating existing

buildings

. Already established

buildings

will not only be ineffective but

also

the question of their future purpose remains the same. In fact, many old constructions which were used during the British era in India not only lost their charm but became historically ignored.

Therefore

it is suggested to renovate existing

buildings

is more economically viable than erecting new

buildings

. In many countries like the United Kingdom most of the government

buildings

like railway stations, and Parliament are serving the nation as their famous landmark along with being major public access for everyday activities. A few points should be noticed before deciding whether to invest public funds in constructing new public

buildings

are to renovating existing ones. If renovation is equally costly in comparison to new

buildings

then

it is suggestive to prefer modern and strong

buildings

after the effective disposal of old

buildings

. In

this

case, government officials may sell the old building in the public auction and use that resource for the planning and construction of new

buildings

. Even renting old premises for continuous financial supply for mega projects is

also

a good idea.